We don’t sell a platform. We help you imagine what your security team could become — then build it with you, using the tools and data you already own.
FILTER
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Buy a GRC tool (Archer, ServiceNow, OneTrust)
- Hire consultants to configure and set up
- Build policy and assessment process manually
- Engage a team to conduct assessments quarterly
- Manually chase vendors for responses
- Stale data between assessment cycles
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a TPRM agent trained on your policy and risk appetite
- Automated vendor questionnaire generation and chasing
- Continuous monitoring of vendor risk signals from your tools
- Risk scoring updated in real time — not point-in-time
- Board-ready vendor risk summary generated automatically
- You own the process, the data, and the outputs
Result: Vendor risk assessed continuously. Time saved: 80% reduction in manual assessment effort. Built from your existing tools and data.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Engage a consulting firm for annual assessment
- 6–8 week engagement — interviews and workshops
- Manual evidence collection from multiple teams
- Report delivered — already stale on receipt
- Gap remediation tracked in a spreadsheet
- Repeat the process next financial year
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build an Essential Eight agent using your tool data as evidence
- Automated control mapping from CrowdStrike, Tenable, Wiz, Okta
- Live maturity score updated as controls change
- Gap analysis ranked by business risk and effort
- Remediation tracked automatically — no spreadsheets
- Regulator-ready evidence pack generated on demand
Result: Continuous compliance posture. No annual consulting engagement. Evidence assembled from tools you already own.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Engage a SOCI specialist consulting firm
- Months to build the CIRMP documentation
- Manual evidence collection across OT and IT
- Point-in-time compliance status only
- A$643K/day penalty exposure often unknown
- Annual review cycle creates gaps between reports
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a CIRMP agent connected to your IT and OT environments
- Automated control documentation from live tool data
- Penalty exposure calculated and updated daily
- Gap remediation prioritised by penalty risk
- Always-on evidence collection — regulator-ready on request
- IEC 62443, SOCI Act, Essential Eight mapped simultaneously
Result: Continuous CIRMP compliance. Penalty exposure visible at all times. Replaces SOCI advisor plus MSSP combined.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Separate consultants for each framework
- CPS 234, ISO 27001, Essential Eight assessed independently
- Overlapping evidence collected multiple times
- No cross-framework optimisation
- Compliance tracked in five different spreadsheets
- Audit preparation takes weeks each cycle
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a unified compliance agent across all your frameworks
- Single evidence collection mapped to all frameworks simultaneously
- One fix closes multiple framework gaps automatically
- Live dashboard across CPS 234, Essential Eight, SOCI, ISO 27001, NIS2
- Audit evidence pack generated automatically per framework
- Controls cross-referenced — no duplicate effort
Result: One compliance posture. Five frameworks. Audit-ready on demand. Evidence from tools you already own.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Engage risk consultants for annual FAIR assessment
- Weeks of workshops and data gathering
- Risk expressed in CVSS scores or Red/Amber/Green
- CFO and board cannot interpret security risk
- No connection between tool findings and dollar exposure
- Risk register updated manually — stale within weeks
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a FAIR risk agent connected to your live tool data
- Automated Monte Carlo simulation from your actual environment
- Exposure quantified in AUD — CFO-native language
- Risk scenarios modelled: ransomware, breach, SOCI penalty
- Risk P&L updated continuously as posture changes
- Board brief generated automatically each quarter
Result: Live financial risk quantification. Board answers ‘what would a breach cost us?’ with a real number.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Engage Big 4 for cyber due diligence
- 6–8 week engagement minimum
- Limited access to target environment
- Point-in-time snapshot only
- Deal-breaker risks often missed or understated
- Integration cost rarely modelled accurately
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Deploy the Security Factory on target environment in 48 hours
- Full security posture scored from available tool data
- Deal-breaker risks surfaced and quantified in AUD
- Integration cost modelled against your existing environment
- Compliance gap analysis across relevant frameworks
- Report delivered before deal close — not after
Result: Target company posture scored in 48 hours. Deal-breaker risks quantified. Integration cost modelled. Replaces Big 4 cyber DD.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Tenable and Qualys produce thousands of findings
- Manual triage across multiple tools
- Prioritisation based on CVSS scores — not business context
- Patching teams overwhelmed — no clear order
- Findings duplicated across tools — no deduplication
- Monthly vulnerability report takes weeks to produce
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a vulnerability agent across all your scanning tools
- Automated deduplication across Tenable, Qualys, Wiz, Snyk
- Prioritisation by asset criticality, exposure and business impact
- Patching roadmap ranked by risk reduction per effort
- Live vulnerability posture — not monthly snapshots
- Business case attached to each remediation decision
Result: 13,000 findings reduced to prioritised decisions. Patching team knows what to fix Monday morning. Business context — not CVSS scores.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Annual or quarterly pentest engagement
- Report delivered as PDF — findings in spreadsheet
- Manual triage and remediation tracking
- Evidence file built manually for board or auditors
- Findings lose context between cycles
- No continuous testing between engagements
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a pentest-to-proof agent on your environment
- Continuous pentest rotation — not point-in-time
- Every finding triaged, owner-assigned, tracked automatically
- Remediation evidence collected and formatted for audit
- Board-ready pentest summary generated each cycle
- Historical trend visible — posture improvement measured
Result: Continuous pentest. Every finding tracked to closure. Evidence file audit-ready on demand. Replaces Mandiant or Bishop Fox retainer.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Incident response depends on senior analysts
- Playbooks stored in documents — rarely updated
- Knowledge walks out the door when people leave
- Post-incident reviews done manually — weeks after the event
- No connection between incidents and compliance obligations
- Lessons learned rarely actioned
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build an IR agent trained on your environment and past incidents
- Playbooks generated automatically from your tool data and history
- Institutional knowledge captured and operationalised
- Post-incident review automated — timeline, root cause, remediation
- Compliance implications surfaced automatically per incident
- Lessons learned tracked and deployed to future playbooks
Result: Institutional knowledge preserved. Post-incident reviews automated. Playbooks always current. Team is not the single point of failure.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- CISO team spends 3 weeks producing quarterly board report
- Manual data aggregation from 15 different tools
- Report stale by the time it prints
- Security language — board cannot interpret it
- No financial exposure figure — just CVSS and RAG ratings
- Board makes risk decisions on incomplete information
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a board reporting agent on your live tool data
- Six-page quarterly brief generated automatically
- Risk quantified in AUD — CFO and chair can act on it
- Compliance status, active threats, priority actions included
- Updated continuously — never stale
- Translation layer from security language to business language
Result: Board report generated overnight. Risk in AUD. 3 weeks of manual work eliminated. Board finally gets the answers they’ve been asking for.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- No clear view of which tools are delivering value
- Tool sprawl grows unchecked — budget consumed
- Renewals approved without performance evidence
- Security team cannot justify spend to CFO
- Overlapping tools go undetected
- Annual spend review based on gut feel
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a tool effectiveness agent across your entire stack
- Each tool measured against actual risk reduction delivered
- Overlap identified — duplicate coverage flagged
- ROI calculated per tool — CFO-grade justification
- Renewal recommendations backed by evidence
- Budget reallocation modelled — where to invest vs cut
Result: Every security tool justified by evidence. Overlap eliminated. Budget reallocated to what actually reduces risk.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Annual supplier security questionnaires
- Manual review and scoring
- No visibility between assessment cycles
- Critical suppliers treated same as low-risk ones
- No connection to your own risk posture
- Questionnaire responses taken at face value
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a supply chain risk agent connected to your environment
- Automated risk scoring from open source intelligence and tool data
- Continuous monitoring — alerts when supplier posture changes
- Critical supplier risk connected to your own exposure
- Assessment frequency matched to supplier criticality
- Evidence collected automatically — audit-ready on demand
Result: Continuous supply chain risk monitoring. Critical suppliers prioritised. No annual questionnaire cycles.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- Security team drowning in manual reporting and aggregation
- Analysts doing admin work instead of security work
- Capability constrained by headcount budget
- Senior analyst time consumed by routine tasks
- Knowledge concentrated in individuals — fragile
- Burnout and attrition from repetitive manual work
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build automation agents for your highest-volume manual workflows
- Reporting, triage, evidence collection all automated
- Analysts freed to focus on decisions — not data aggregation
- Agentic layer covers routine tasks 24/7 — team doesn’t
- Knowledge captured in agents — not individual heads
- Capacity scales without headcount
Result: Team capacity multiplied. Manual work eliminated. Analysts make decisions — agents do the aggregation.
TRADITIONAL MODEL
- vCISO engaged on a day-rate or monthly retainer
- Limited availability — hours consumed quickly
- Advice based on industry knowledge — not your environment
- No institutional memory between engagements
- Board preparation takes hours of briefing time
- Strategic decisions made without live data
EPOCH KI MODEL
- Build a CISO advisory agent trained on your program context
- Strategic advice grounded in your actual environment and data
- Board preparation automated from live posture
- Always available — not limited by retainer hours
- Institutional memory preserved across every engagement
- Decisions backed by evidence — not industry benchmarks
Result: Strategic CISO capability available continuously. Advice from your data — not generic frameworks. Board preparation automated.
Want to see one of these built for your environment? hello@epochki.com